统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考| Cultural Identification With the Leading Paradigms

如果你也在 怎样代写机器学习machine learning这个学科遇到相关的难题,请随时右上角联系我们的24/7代写客服。


statistics-lab™ 为您的留学生涯保驾护航 在代写机器学习machine learning方面已经树立了自己的口碑, 保证靠谱, 高质且原创的统计Statistics代写服务。我们的专家在代写机器学习machine learning代写方面经验极为丰富,各种代写机器学习machine learning相关的作业也就用不着说。

我们提供的机器学习machine learning及其相关学科的代写,服务范围广, 其中包括但不限于:

  • Statistical Inference 统计推断
  • Statistical Computing 统计计算
  • Advanced Probability Theory 高等概率论
  • Advanced Mathematical Statistics 高等数理统计学
  • (Generalized) Linear Models 广义线性模型
  • Statistical Machine Learning 统计机器学习
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis 纵向数据分析
  • Foundations of Data Science 数据科学基础
Humanising Language Teaching Magazine for teachers and teacher trainers
统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考| Cultural Identification With the Leading Paradigms

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|Scientific Intelligence

We have already mentioned the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. According to his Borromean Knot concept, individuals have to organize their imaginary intentions in accordance with symbolic orders, which present structures able to organize and offer a state of cultural significance to their imaginative, still not realized desires. Lacan himself “introjected,” in his own theoretical project such a structural system of significance, the topological theory. He was largely influenced by the paradigm of the topological geometry, as, for example, offered by René Thom and his leading mathematical research, presented in books of high international publicity as his Stabilité structurelle et morphogenèse (1972) – Structural Stability and Morphogenesis (1975). “Introjected,” a term describing the result of the mental mechanism of “introjection,” the way that individuals, or even social groups may unconsciously “identify” themselves with culturally prominent modes of behavior (Laplanche 1978, pp. 209-210 and 187-190). In our case of interest, identification with leading scientific paradigms may mean our desire to appropriate prestigious proposals or, in a disinterested way, our need to imitate innovative concepts and processes that gained our admiration, though we cannot fully understand and assimilate them. In those cases, admiration or desire for cultural prestige appears to surpass the real possibility of understanding, culturally promoting innovative orientations in a number of expressive approaches, outside their initial scientific nucleus.

In any case, we could return to our first assertions, presented previously in our introductory remarks. Accordingly, the cultural intelligence of given societies,

during historic periods that present important distinctive characteristics, tends to appear as a multimodal condition, infiltrated in many different scientific and expressive approaches often in an unconscious mimetic way. It thus forms a distinct historical quality, representing the pronounced “smartness” of the era; avant-garde scientific and technological inventiveness together with a general cultural volition for innovative behavior and expression, in many cases presented as an ethical prerogative, a political and moral obligation of the period.

We recently use the word “smart,” in order to describe the contemporary cultural association of our societies with the “smart” computational technology; however, this recently introduced connotation does not mean that previous epistemic paradigms did not possess their own scientific and cultural importance, expressed in their own “smart” historically concrete way. Moreover, this recently introduced reference does not mean that the contemporary “smart” paradigm does not possess a scientific and cultural genealogy rooted in previous epistemic predecessors; we have also insisted on this assertion previously. We thus stated that contemporary “smart” mentality may rather be associated with the previously described epistemic condition of the nineteenth century. Even the contemporary notion of the landscape in motion, of “earth that moves” in accordance with the topological intuition and the animate computational simulation, may seek its predecessors in nineteenth-century vitalism approaches, concerning as we already stated, organic as well inorganic formations. In both cases, we may remark that the stability of objects “is eroded by time” (Cache 1995 , p. 96).

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|Topological Mathematics, Computational Simulation

Interest for topology was already present during the nineteenth century, with important contributions as the Vorstudien zur Topologie, by Johan Benedict Listing (1847) or Henri Poincaré’s, Analysis Situs (1895). It was during the middle of the last century that the subject attained an extended cultural influence, which however reached its apogee rather recently, after the extended use of computational technology. It is characteristic that the proposal of Gilles Deleuze, who attempted to associate the genesis of topology in Western history with Leibniz and the Baroque period, was largely connected to his academic association with Bernard Cache, whose knowledge of mathematics and even more his immediate experience of computer design applications offered a source of inspiration for the French philosopher. Moreover, soon after the publication of Deleuze’s Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque – The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque (Deleuze 1988, 1992), folding forms invaded the realm of design practices of every possible scale; in building, landscape, and urban design, as well as in the interior and object design. It is in this context that we may understand the title of Cache’s book, Earth Moves: The Furnishing of Territories (1995), or the title of its French edition, Terre-Meuble (1995, 1997).

In the French language, the world “meuble” refers not to furnishing in general, not to the built-in, immovable pieces, but more precisely to the movable items, which may change their place position. It is in such a metaphoric way that we may approach the earth bas-relief, as a condition under change, as “earth that moves.” In addition, we may approach its design formation, its “furnishing” through computer design in the same animate way that we may approach object design, the design of the objects-pieces of furnishing. It is in this very context that we may also decodify Cache’s remark to which we already previously referred; “object is eroded by time.” It is in this very context that our design proposals all of them, at any scale of reference, acquired the tendency to become “smart.” They “got the trend” to be correlated to topological inventiveness and computational design applications as well. We mean that since the end of the last century a large part of innovative design “has to be” oriented to those directions, it has to present them in excess, it is “fashionable” to present this “smart” identity in order to be accepted as an innovative creation. Likewise contemporary design approaches often mimetize the topological folding continuity of a curvilinear surface. In their awarded competition proposal for the Yokohama Port Terminal, FOA architects presented a 3D image of a continuous folded form, as produced by their computer parametric approach. In reality, the built final surface of the terminal was not a continuous, “smooth” surface as depicted in the 3D presentations of the competition proposal. It pretended that it was continuous, non-fragmentary, and articulated, though it was formed on a “striated,” metallic bearing structure.

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|A Space-Time Metaphor Not Realized in Building

Speaking in terms of historical reference, the cultural agony for a time agitated reality attained an important theoretical status long before computational animate simulation. Kantian philosophical inventiveness described space and time, in his Critique of Pure Reason, as the inter-related “conditions of sensibility, under which alone outer intuition is possible for us” (1998, p. 149, A26/B42). Nothing could be conceived outside space and time reference. This initial “smart” contribution to neoteric theory could certainly be associated with the general epistemic identity of the eighteenth and nineteenth century, to the previously cited influence of concepts of change and metabolism introduced through biology, political theory, and for sure through the continuous social radical change. Historians also correlate it to the development of the mechanized world, to steam machines, to moving engines of all sorts, invading the state of production and transportation. In a certain way, the everyday reality was redirected on the ground of new scientific and technological proposals; however, we may again insist on our remark about a non-fully conscious development of a culture that is also extended at the field of science. Thus, the sensation of a new mechanical “motivation” attended an extended expressive status. We have already mentioned the concept of “function” that survives in architectural discourse for more than a century, pretending that architectural objects, though largely immovable in themselves, may activate functional uses. In terms of constructive reality, the only practically movable parts of buildings or urban formations are those that refer to mechanical and electromechanical devices. This lack of real movement was culturally replaced in the immovable “body” of architecture or in the immovable depictions, during the first decades of the twentieth century, by the extended formal metaphor of the desired action. It is not strange that the holy bible of architectural modernity bears the title Space, Time and Architecture (1967); a correlation of terms that, according to its author, had attended the status of a new “tradition”; a status of cultural influence extended outside centralized conscious expression as established custom and belief. It was in this sense that De Stijl architects and painters were trying to expand three-dimensional spatial stability by expressing the fourth dimension of time; Russian constructivism presented a potential movement, while Vladimir Tatlin attempted to connote the dialectics of history, the Marxist approach of continuous social change, through the twin helixes of his Monument to the Third International.

RESET WELLNESS on Whyte Ave - Manual Osteopathy, Massage & Mental Health  Services
统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考| Cultural Identification With the Leading Paradigms


统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|Scientific Intelligence

我们已经提到了法国精神分析学家雅克·拉康。根据他的 Borromean Knot 概念,个人必须按照象征秩序来组织他们的想象意图,这些结构呈现出能够组织并为他们想象中的、尚未实现的欲望提供一种文化意义的状态。拉康本人在他自己的理论项目中“内射”了这样一个具有重要意义的结构系统,即拓扑理论。他在很大程度上受到拓扑几何范式的影响,例如,René Thom 和他的领先数学研究提供的,在高度国际宣传的书籍中作为他的 Stabilité structurelle et morphogenèse (1972) – Structural Stability and Morphogenesis (1975) )。“内射”,一个描述“内射”心理机制结果的术语,”个人,甚至社会群体可能会无意识地“认同”自己与文化上突出的行为模式的方式(Laplanche 1978,pp. 209-210 和 187-190)。在我们感兴趣的案例中,认同领先的科学范式可能意味着我们渴望采纳有声望的建议,或者以一种无私的方式,我们需要模仿获得我们钦佩的创新概念和过程,尽管我们无法完全理解和吸收它们。在这些情况下,对文化声望的钦佩或渴望似乎超过了理解的真正可能性,在其最初的科学核心之外,以许多表达方式在文化上促进了创新方向。209-210 和 187-190)。在我们感兴趣的案例中,认同领先的科学范式可能意味着我们渴望采纳有声望的建议,或者以一种无私的方式,我们需要模仿获得我们钦佩的创新概念和过程,尽管我们无法完全理解和吸收它们。在这些情况下,对文化声望的钦佩或渴望似乎超过了理解的真正可能性,在其最初的科学核心之外,以许多表达方式在文化上促进了创新方向。209-210 和 187-190)。在我们感兴趣的案例中,认同领先的科学范式可能意味着我们渴望采纳有声望的建议,或者以一种无私的方式,我们需要模仿获得我们钦佩的创新概念和过程,尽管我们无法完全理解和吸收它们。在这些情况下,对文化声望的钦佩或渴望似乎超过了理解的真正可能性,在其最初的科学核心之外,以许多表达方式在文化上促进了创新方向。尽管我们无法完全理解和同化它们。在这些情况下,对文化声望的钦佩或渴望似乎超过了理解的真正可能性,在其最初的科学核心之外,以许多表达方式在文化上促进了创新方向。尽管我们无法完全理解和同化它们。在这些情况下,对文化声望的钦佩或渴望似乎超过了理解的真正可能性,在其最初的科学核心之外,以许多表达方式在文化上促进了创新方向。



我们最近使用“智能”一词来描述我们社会与“智能”计算技术的当代文化联系;然而,这种最近引入的内涵并不意味着以前的认知范式不具备其自身的科学和文化重要性,以它们自己的“聪明”的历史具体方式来表达。此外,这个最近引入的参考并不意味着当代“智能”范式不具备植根于先前认知前辈的科学和文化谱系;我们之前也坚持过这一说法。因此,我们指出,当代的“聪明”心态可能与前面描述的 19 世纪的认知状况有关。即使是当代的动态景观概念,根据拓扑直觉和有生命的计算模拟,“运动的地球”可能会在 19 世纪的活力论方法中寻找它的前辈,正如我们已经说过的,关于有机和无机地层。在这两种情况下,我们都可以说对象的稳定性“被时间侵蚀”(Cache 1995, p. 96)。

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|Topological Mathematics, Computational Simulation

对拓扑的兴趣在 19 世纪就已经出现,其中重要的贡献是由 Johan Benedict Listing (1847) 或 Henri Poincaré 的 Analysis Situs (1895) 撰写的 Vorstudien zur Topologie。在上世纪中叶,该主题获得了广泛的文化影响,但在计算技术的广泛使用之后,这种影响在最近才达到了顶峰。其特点是,试图将西方历史拓扑学的起源与莱布尼茨和巴洛克时期联系起来的吉尔德勒兹的提议在很大程度上与他与伯纳德 Cache 的学术联系有关,后者的数学知识,甚至更多的是他对数学的直接经验。计算机设计应用程序为这位法国哲学家提供了灵感来源。而且,德勒兹的《勒普利》出版后不久。Leibniz et le Baroque – 褶皱。Leibniz and the Baroque (Deleuze 1988, 1992),折叠形式侵入了各种可能规模的设计实践领域;在建筑、景观和城市设计,以及室内和物体设计方面。正是在这种背景下,我们才可以理解 Cache 的书名《Earth Moves: The Furnishing of Territories》(1995),或者其法文版的名称《Terre-Meuble》(1995、1997)。

在法语中,世界“meuble”不是指一般的家具,也不是指内置的、不可移动的部件,更准确地说是指可移动的物品,这些物品可能会改变它们的放置位置。正是以这样一种隐喻的方式,我们可以将地球浅浮雕作为变化中的条件,作为“移动的地球”。此外,我们可以通过计算机设计来处理它的设计形式,它的“家具”,就像我们可以处理对象设计,对象-家具的设计一样。正是在这种情况下,我们也可以对我们之前提到的 Cache 的评论进行解码;“物体被时间侵蚀。” 正是在这种背景下,我们所有的设计方案,在任何参考尺度上,都具有变得“智能”的趋势。” 他们“有趋势”与拓​​扑创新和计算设计应用相关联。我们的意思是,自上世纪末以来,很大一部分创新设计“必须”面向这些方向,必须过度呈现它们,呈现这种“智能”身份是“时尚的”,以便成为被接受为创新产品。同样,当代设计方法经常模仿曲线表面的拓扑折叠连续性。在横滨港码头的获奖竞赛方案中,FOA 建筑师展示了由他们的计算机参数化方法生成的连续折叠形式的 3D 图像。实际上,航站楼的最终建成表面并不是竞赛提案的 3D 演示中所描绘的连续、“光滑”的表面。

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考|A Space-Time Metaphor Not Realized in Building

就历史参照而言,一时间激荡现实的文化痛苦早在计算动画模拟之前就已获得重要的理论地位。康德的哲学创造性在他的《纯粹理性批判》中将空间和时间描述为相互关联的“感性条件,在这些条件下,只有外在直觉对我们来说是可能的”(1998,第 149 页,A26/B42)。除了空间和时间参考之外,没有任何东西可以被设想。对近代理论的这种最初的“聪明”贡献肯定与十八和十九世纪的一般认知同一性有关,与前面提到的通过生物学、政治理论引入的变化和新陈代谢概念的影响有关,当然也与不断的社会巨变。历史学家还将其与机械化世界的发展、蒸汽机、各种移动发动机、入侵生产和运输状态相关联。在某种程度上,日常现实被重新定位在新的科学技术建议的基础上;然而,我们可能会再次坚持我们的评论,即一种文化的非完全有意识的发展,这种文化也在科学领域得到了扩展。因此,一种新的机械“动力”的感觉伴随着一种扩展的表达状态。我们已经提到了在建筑话语中存在了一个多世纪的“功能”概念,假装建筑对象虽然在很大程度上本身是不动的,但可以激活功能用途。在建设性现实方面,建筑物或城市结构中唯一实际可移动的部分是指机械和机电设备的部分。在 20 世纪最初的几十年里,在不可移动的建筑“身体”或不可移动的描绘中,这种缺乏真正的运动在文化上被所期望的行为的扩展形式隐喻所取代。建筑现代性的圣经以《空间、时间与建筑》(1967 年)为标题,这并不奇怪。根据其作者的说法,这些术语的相关性已经体现了新“传统”的地位;一种文化影响的地位延伸到作为既定习俗和信仰的集中意识表达之外。正是在这个意义上,De Stijl 的建筑师和画家试图通过表达时间的第四维度来扩展三维空间的稳定性;

统计代写|机器学习作业代写machine learning代考 请认准statistics-lab™

统计代写请认准statistics-lab™. statistics-lab™为您的留学生涯保驾护航。







术语 广义线性模型(GLM)通常是指给定连续和/或分类预测因素的连续响应变量的常规线性回归模型。它包括多元线性回归,以及方差分析和方差分析(仅含固定效应)。



有限元是一种通用的数值方法,用于解决两个或三个空间变量的偏微分方程(即一些边界值问题)。为了解决一个问题,有限元将一个大系统细分为更小、更简单的部分,称为有限元。这是通过在空间维度上的特定空间离散化来实现的,它是通过构建对象的网格来实现的:用于求解的数值域,它有有限数量的点。边界值问题的有限元方法表述最终导致一个代数方程组。该方法在域上对未知函数进行逼近。[1] 然后将模拟这些有限元的简单方程组合成一个更大的方程系统,以模拟整个问题。然后,有限元通过变化微积分使相关的误差函数最小化来逼近一个解决方案。





随机过程,是依赖于参数的一组随机变量的全体,参数通常是时间。 随机变量是随机现象的数量表现,其时间序列是一组按照时间发生先后顺序进行排列的数据点序列。通常一组时间序列的时间间隔为一恒定值(如1秒,5分钟,12小时,7天,1年),因此时间序列可以作为离散时间数据进行分析处理。研究时间序列数据的意义在于现实中,往往需要研究某个事物其随时间发展变化的规律。这就需要通过研究该事物过去发展的历史记录,以得到其自身发展的规律。


多元回归分析渐进(Multiple Regression Analysis Asymptotics)属于计量经济学领域,主要是一种数学上的统计分析方法,可以分析复杂情况下各影响因素的数学关系,在自然科学、社会和经济学等多个领域内应用广泛。


MATLAB 是一种用于技术计算的高性能语言。它将计算、可视化和编程集成在一个易于使用的环境中,其中问题和解决方案以熟悉的数学符号表示。典型用途包括:数学和计算算法开发建模、仿真和原型制作数据分析、探索和可视化科学和工程图形应用程序开发,包括图形用户界面构建MATLAB 是一个交互式系统,其基本数据元素是一个不需要维度的数组。这使您可以解决许多技术计算问题,尤其是那些具有矩阵和向量公式的问题,而只需用 C 或 Fortran 等标量非交互式语言编写程序所需的时间的一小部分。MATLAB 名称代表矩阵实验室。MATLAB 最初的编写目的是提供对由 LINPACK 和 EISPACK 项目开发的矩阵软件的轻松访问,这两个项目共同代表了矩阵计算软件的最新技术。MATLAB 经过多年的发展,得到了许多用户的投入。在大学环境中,它是数学、工程和科学入门和高级课程的标准教学工具。在工业领域,MATLAB 是高效研究、开发和分析的首选工具。MATLAB 具有一系列称为工具箱的特定于应用程序的解决方案。对于大多数 MATLAB 用户来说非常重要,工具箱允许您学习应用专业技术。工具箱是 MATLAB 函数(M 文件)的综合集合,可扩展 MATLAB 环境以解决特定类别的问题。可用工具箱的领域包括信号处理、控制系统、神经网络、模糊逻辑、小波、仿真等。



您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注